play blackjack switch cmgl

Online Casino

Online Casino at risk and criminals can act freely. ” Sen. Online Casino Dean Heller (R-Nev. )“…prevent the abuses and wrongdoing that clearly are inherent, almost inescapable, in this form of gambling…” Sen. Online Casino Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn. )The list of erroneous hyperbole goes on and on from that one article. But it gives us an insight as to what will occur and how they will accomplish it. Online Casino Fearmongering 101. Online Casino Online Casino As published on Casinomeister. com and republished here for the public good under “fair use”.

The following is an unedited response from Phill Brear, Gambling Commissioner of Gibraltar, posted in its entirety. Third and final comment:It appears we are never going to agree on this issue, but let me have one last attempt, on your terms and through your method, to explain why we are so far apart on our views. Online Casino Online Casino As occurred in the first thread, most of the comments made in the second thread remain unfounded, inaccurate and are at times malicious/self-serving. Online Casino Crown Poker Rake Zcbe It is clear that many people comment on our conclusions without even reading the thread, let alone what I have written, and now make personal attacks and agree with assertions made by other people who have also not read what has been written nor examined the regulatory position. Perhaps Bryan can throw some light on this practice by producing the stats which show how many people who have made comments have visited and read every page of BOTH threads? Online Casino This practice of ‘conclude before you even check’ now extends to best casinos in australiaa ludicrous ‘petition’ which further distorts the circumstances of this event, despite the initiator having a personal dialogue with me, and leads to what, a loss of confidence in the remote gambling industry amongst the people who have been misled into signing it?‘Conclude before you even check’ also extends to quoting the GRA’s rules to the GRA. Online Casino Well, not quite. If you take the trouble to visit our website and read our rules, you will see that the GRA is not the Gibraltar gambling regulator. Online Casino The GRA has had nothing to do with us for nearly three years. Online Casino So all those who tell us what our rules say appear to have not even looked at them, as they make explicit that the Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner is the Gibraltar regulator, and publishes the rules, known as RTOS (Remote Technical and Operating Standards), and how they are to be applied in such circumstances. Online Casino Online Casino

Why Choose Online Casino Today?

Can I take you seriously if you don’t read your own threads, don’t read what I have written, don’t know who we are, or read what our rules are, but you agree with the supercilious, aggrandised egomaniacs who splash their opinions on the thread as if they had access to the relevant data, coupled with infallible judgement and had done their own homework?So what do our rules say? Online Casino Online Casino They do say games should not be ‘adaptive’ ie , “the probability of any particular outcome occurring should be the same every time the game is played, except as provided for in the (fair) rules of the game. Online Casino ” So tbest casinos in australiahe games were not adaptive as we or any other regulator defines that term. Online Casino As the outcome of every call was entirely random, albeit weighted against the player, the game is not adaptive. Thebes Casino 65 Gajr Note that the game was approved for use in all the European jurisdictions which licence online slot play. Free Online Pokies No Sign Up Qixa Then we have the assertions about the game representing a device. Online Casino Well, where is that rule? Indeed, where is that card game that uses 12 of 13 cards in this way and with these bets? Online Casino The claim that it breaks an imaginary US or European rule is a complete nonsense. Rich Casino Bonus Vqub Read RTOS, you will not find the so-called rule you are told the game breaches; not in our rules or any other remote gambling rules (I am familiar with most of them).

You might think such a rule exists, and it does for certain specified circumstances, but not for these circumstances. Read our RTOS section 7. 1(5). What you will see is: “A licence holder should not implement game designs or features that may reasonably be expected to mislead the customer about the likelihood of particular results occurring. This includes, but is not limited to the following:………”It is my office which has to decide if what occurred amounted to an operator breaching that rule. The answer is no, because the evidence, precedent, and a common sense interpretation say no. The examples which we go on to