pop slots help wwqn

Live Blackjack Online Casino d into signing it?‘Conclude before you even check’ also extends to quoting the GRA’s rules to the GRA. Well, not quite. new free slot apps If you take the trouble to visit our website and read our rules, you will see that the GRA is not the Gibraltar gambling regulator. doubledown casino not working The GRA has had nothing to do with us for nearly three years. 21 blackjack 2 izle Blackjack Dice Game Online Apiu So all those who tell us what our rules say appear to have not even looked at them, as they make explicit that the Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner is the Gibraltar regulator, and publishes the rules, known as RTOS (Remote Technical and Operating Standards), and how they are to be applied in such circumstances. Can I take you seriously if you don’t read your own threads, don’t read what I have written, don’t know who we are, or read what our rules are, but you agree with the supercilious, aggrandised egomaniacs who splash their opinions on the thread as if they had access to the relevant data, coupled with infallible judgement and had done their own homework?So what do our rules say? They do say games should not be ‘adaptive’ ie , “the probability of any particular outcome occurring should be the same every time the game is played, except as provided for in the (fair) rules of the game. ” So the games were not adaptive as we or any other regulator defines that term. au slots bonus codes 2022 777 casino summer 100

As the outcome of every call was entirely random, albeit weighted against the player, the game is not adaptive. live blackjack real money Note that the game was approved for use in all the European blackjack side bets ukjurisdictions which licence online slot play. Then we have the assertions about the game representing a device. Well, where is that rule? play blackjack online australia Indeed, where is that card game that uses 12 of 13 cards in this way and with these bets? The claim that it breaks an imaginary US or European rule is a complete nonsense. casino pools brisbane Read RTOS, you will not find the so-called rule you are told the game breaches; not in our rules or any other remote gambling rules (I am familiar with most of them). You might think such a rule exists, and it does for certain specified circumstances, but not for these circumstances. texas holdem poker zynga facebook Blackjack Online Android Qkix

Key Insights and Expert Analysis

Read our RTOS section 7. Texas Holdem Poker Youtube 1(5). What you will see is: “A licence holder should not implement game designs or features that may reasonably be expected to mislead the customer about the likelihood of particular results occurring. This includes, but is not limited to the following:………”It is my office which has to decide if what occurred amounted to an operator breaching that rule. brian christopher slots spouse The answer is no, because the evidence, precedent, and a common sense interpretation say no. The examples which we go on to use refer to ‘simulates physical devices’. las vegas real money slots HiLo/Reel Deal does not simulate a physical device, it is a bespoke slot game. online pokies real money no deposit australia toys r us casino games Even if this rule did apply, which it does not, we still have to apply a ‘reasonableness test’ in terms of how or why the rule was breached.

You cannot look at a game 10 years after it has been introduced and after millions and millions blackjack side bets ukof plays without any challenge, which has been accepted in numerous jurisdictions, and then say – that game is misleading everyone, because it obviously isn’t. Jackpot Empire Slots What happened was the introduction of a paytable error, not the creation of an unfair game. blackjack game example python We have taken sufficient and proportionate action with regard to that error, consistent with the likely actions of any other regulator presented with a similar error. royal ace casino bonus This conclusion also impacts on the calls for reimbursement. free money casino australia Reimburse who, back to when, what for? Are you seriously saying the operator should reimburse