is playing blackjack a sin aagg

Texas Holdem Poker Chips d into signing it?‘Conclude before you even check’ also extends to quoting the GRA’s rules to the GRA. online 50 50 gambling Well, not quite. miami club casino terms and conditions If you take the trouble to visit our website and read our rules, you will see that the GRA is not the Gibraltar gambling regulator. European Roulette Wheel Rules Amju The GRA has had nothing to do with us for nearly three years. video slots real money Loki 4 Casino Dnnk So all those who tell us what our rules say appear to have not even looked at them, as they make explicit that the Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner is the Gibraltar regulator, and publishes the rules, known as RTOS (Remote Technical and Operating Standards), and how they are to be applied in such circumstances. Can I take you seriously if you don’t read your own threads, don’t read what I have written, don’t know who we are, or read what our rules are, but you agree with the supercilious, aggrandised egomaniacs who splash their opinions on the thread as if they had access to the relevant data, coupled with infallible judgement and had done their own homework?So what do our rules say? free chips blackjack 21 They do say games should not be ‘adaptive’ ie , “the probability of any particular outcome occurring should be the same every time the game is played, except as provided for in the (fair) rules of the game. Bitcoin Gambling Free Vtdm ” So the games were not adaptive as we or any other regulator defines that term.

As the outcome of every call was entirely random, albeit weighted against the player, the game is not adaptive. free slot machine games laptop Note that the game was approved for use in all the European cashman casino hack apkjurisdictions which licence online slot play. casino free games no download no registration Then we have the assertions about the game representing a device. napoleon y josefina slot machine Well, where is that rule? Indeed, where is that card game that uses 12 of 13 cards in this way and with these bets? The claim that it breaks an imaginary US or European rule is a complete nonsense. Read RTOS, you will not find the so-called rule you are told the game breaches; not in our rules or any other remote gambling rules (I am familiar with most of them). subscribe to double down casino emails Planet 7 X No Deposit Bonus Codes Jfdn You might think such a rule exists, and it does for certain specified circumstances, but not for these circumstances. grosvenor casino blackjack jackpot

Key Insights and Expert Analysis

Read our RTOS section 7. 1(5). What you will see is: “A licence holder should not implement game designs or features that may reasonably be expected to mislead the customer about the likelihood of particular results occurring. big win pompeii slots free slot games casino.org This includes, but is not limited to the following:………”It is my office which has to decide if what occurred amounted to an operator breaching that rule. gta 5 online casino update The answer is no, because the evidence, precedent, and a common sense interpretation say no. The examples which we go on to use refer to ‘simulates physical devices’. rich casino no deposit free spins HiLo/Reel Deal does not simulate a physical device, it is a bespoke slot game. Even if this rule did apply, which it does not, we still have to apply a ‘reasonableness test’ in terms of how or why the rule was breached. blackjack online juego golden nugget casino slots online casino roulette echtes geld

You cannot look at a game 10 years after it has been introduced and after millions and millions cashman casino hack apkof plays without any challenge, which has been accepted in numerous jurisdictions, and then say – that game is misleading everyone, because it obviously isn’t. What happened was the introduction of a paytable error, not the creation of an unfair game. We have taken sufficient and proportionate action with regard to that error, consistent with the likely actions of any other regulator presented with a similar error. This conclusion also impacts on the calls for reimbursement. Reimburse who, back to when, what for? Are you seriously saying the operator should reimburse