blackjack side bets app cxye

Online Casino

Online Casino d into signing it?‘Conclude before you even check’ also extends to quoting the GRA’s rules to the GRA. Free Slots Casino Ihym Well, not quite. If you take the trouble to visit our website and read our rules, you will see that the GRA is not the Gibraltar gambling regulator. Online Casino The GRA has had nothing to do with us for nearly three years. Online Casino So all those who tell us what our rules say appear to have not even looked at them, as they make explicit that the Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner is the Gibraltar regulator, and publishes the rules, known as RTOS (Remote Technical and Operating Standards), and how they are to be applied in such circumstances. Online Casino Can I take you seriously if you don’t read your own threads, don’t read what I have written, don’t know who we are, or read what our rules are, but you agree with the supercilious, aggrandised egomaniacs who splash their opinions on the thread as if they had access to the relevant data, coupled with infallible judgement and had done their own homework?So what do our rules say? They do say games should not be ‘adaptive’ ie , “the probability of any particular outcome occurring should be the same every time the game is played, except as provided for in the (fair) rules of the game. ” So the games were not adaptive as we or any other regulator defines that term. Online Casino As the outcome of every call was entirely random, albeit weighted against the player, the game is not adaptive. Online Casino

Note that the game was approved for use in all the European www free slots.games no downloadjurisdictions which licence online slot play. Online Casino Then we have the assertions about the game representing a device. Online Casino Well, where is that rule? Online Casino Online Casino Indeed, where is that card game that uses 12 of 13 cards in this way and with these bets? Australian Online Casino No Deposit Free Spins Rzxo The claim that it breaks an imaginary US or European rule is a complete nonsense. Online Casino Read RTOS, you will not find the so-called rule you are told the game breaches; not in our rules or any other remote gambling rules (I am familiar with most of them). You might think such a rule exists, and it does for certain specified circumstances, but not for these circumstances. No Deposit Casino Forum Ssla Read our RTOS section 7. Online Casino Online Casino 1(5). Online Casino Online Casino

Why Choose Online Casino Today?

What you will see is: “A licence holder should not implement game designs or features that may reasonably be expected to mislead the customer about the likelihood of particular results occurring. Casino Roulette Demo Tjab This includes, but is not limited to the following:………”It is my office which has to decide if what occurred amounted to an operator breaching that rule. Online Casino The answer is no, because the evidence, precedent, and a common sense interpretation say no. Online Casino Online Casino The examples which we go on to use refer to ‘simulates physical devices’. Online Casino HiLo/Reel Deal does not simulate a physical device, it is a bespoke slot game. Online Casino Even if this rule did apply, which it does not, we still have to apply a ‘reasonableness test’ in terms of how or why the rule was breached. You cannot look at a game 10 years after it has been introduced and after millions and millions www free slots.games no downloadof plays without any challenge, which has been accepted in numerous jurisdictions, and then say – that game is misleading everyone, because it obviously isn’t. What happened was the introduction of a paytable error, not the creation of an unfair game. We have taken sufficient and proportionate action with regard to that error, consistent with the likely actions of any other regulator presented with a similar error.

This conclusion also impacts on the calls for reimbursement. Reimburse who, back to when, what for? Online Casino Are you seriously saying the operator should reimburse people who happily played the game, winning and losing, but who eventually lost, who got exactly what they came looking for, because there was an (unseen) error in the Help File? Are you saying the operator should discard his T&C’s that make provision for such unintended minor errors? Maybe there are other T&C’s that should be discarded when it suits the customer, like using your true identities and not using bots, leaving the operator with no protection whatsoever from the scammers out there and the occasional bugs which may work for or against the house, or, as in this case, make no difference whatsoever to the official and tested/approved RTP. If there are any genuine cases out there, let them come forward, I am sure they will get