blackjack playing 2 hands upcb

Poker Online Legal d into signing it?‘Conclude before you even check’ also extends to quoting the GRA’s rules to the GRA. Well, not quite. If you take the trouble to visit our website and read our rules, you will see that the GRA is not the Gibraltar gambling regulator. The GRA has had nothing to do with us for nearly three years. free game european roulette So all those who tell us what our rules say appear to have not even looked at them, as they make explicit that the Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner is the Gibraltar regulator, and publishes the rules, known as RTOS (Remote Technical and Operating Standards), and how they are to be applied in such circumstances. Can I take you seriously if you don’t read your own threads, don’t read what I have written, don’t know who we are, or read what our rules are, but you agree with the supercilious, aggrandised egomaniacs who splash their opinions on the thread as if they had access to the relevant data, coupled with infallible judgement and had done their own homework?So what do our rules say? casino slot it They do say games should not be ‘adaptive’ ie , “the probability of any particular outcome occurring should be the same every time the game is played, except as provided for in the (fair) rules of the game. blackjack casino edge calculator Video Slots With Best Payouts ” So the games were not adaptive as we or any other regulator defines that term.

As the outcome of every call was entirely random, albeit weighted against the player, the game is not adaptive. Note that the game was approved for use in all the European doubleu casino installjurisdictions which licence online slot play. free spin casino online online casino kenya Then we have the assertions about the game representing a device. Well, where is that rule? poker 77777 online Indeed, where is that card game that uses 12 of 13 cards in this way and with these bets? play real slots online for real money The claim that it breaks an imaginary US or European rule is a complete nonsense. Read RTOS, you will not find the so-called rule you are told the game breaches; not in our rules or any other remote gambling rules (I am familiar with most of them). You might think such a rule exists, and it does for certain specified circumstances, but not for these circumstances.

Key Insights and Expert Analysis

Read our RTOS section 7. 1(5). ignition poker payout options Pa Online Casino Sign Up Bonus Hcti What you will see is: “A licence holder should not implement game designs or features that may reasonably be expected to mislead the customer about the likelihood of particular results occurring. uptown casino bonus codes best u.s. online casinos This includes, but is not limited to the following:………”It is my office which has to decide if what occurred amounted to an operator breaching that rule. Real Money Casino Apps South Africa The answer is no, because the evidence, precedent, and a common sense interpretation say no. players edge blackjack The examples which we go on to use refer to ‘simulates physical devices’. joker online casino malaysia HiLo/Reel Deal does not simulate a physical device, it is a bespoke slot game. slot machine 65 Even if this rule did apply, which it does not, we still have to apply a ‘reasonableness test’ in terms of how or why the rule was breached.

You cannot look at a game 10 years after it has been introduced and after millions and millions doubleu casino installof plays without any challenge, which has been accepted in numerous jurisdictions, and then say – that game is misleading everyone, because it obviously isn’t. rich casino real money No Deposit Kings Bonus Codes Sfmz What happened was the introduction of a paytable error, not the creation of an unfair game. slot machine odds We have taken sufficient and proportionate action with regard to that error, consistent with the likely actions of any other regulator presented with a similar error. This conclusion also impacts on the calls for reimbursement. raging bull slots sign in Reimburse who, back to when, what for? Are you seriously saying the operator should reimburse people who